This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
[Bug localedata/1015] There is a need for an alternative belarusian locale
- From: "ShupaS at rferl dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: libc-locales at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 8 Dec 2005 13:45:31 -0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/1015] There is a need for an alternative belarusian locale
- References: <20050616151127.1015.mikhailian@altern.org>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From ShupaS at rferl dot org 2005-12-08 13:45 -------
Yury Tarasievich says:
"I think, word "classic" here would be misleading. This qualifier of the
aforementioned orthography is self-awarded and is inaccurate by any definition,
as both qualifier and orthography aren't used or recognized as such by anybody
excepting rather minor minority."
I wouldn't like to start the old discussion with Mr Tarasevich who has some
unexplained repugnance for that other orthography and has been the only one to
fight it vehemently in all relevant net discussions.
However, I want to draw your attention to an inaccuracy in his comment - upon
which all his argumentation is built:
Those who follow that "other" orthography are in slight MAJORITY (not in minor
minority) on the Net. You can easily prove it - just google any pair of words
spelled differently in the two orthographies.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1015
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.