This is the mail archive of the libc-help@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
August 31, 2008
| 21:20 | Re: Add a strong symbol observable by dynamic linker | Carlos O'Donell |
| 14:23 | Maximum line length for a group | Daniel Qarras |
August 30, 2008
| 15:19 | Add a strong symbol observable by dynamic linker | wuxi |
August 28, 2008
| 13:17 | Re: crash in __nptl_death_event | Carlos O'Donell |
| 10:08 | crash in __nptl_death_event | Jiri Olsa |
| 09:05 | Re: Math error-reporting test scripts useful in glibc? | Agner Fog |
August 27, 2008
| 05:45 | Trouble cross compiling glibc 2.7 with powerpc 440FP target | Jibo |
August 26, 2008
| 06:41 | Re: Math error-reporting test scripts useful in glibc? | Michael Kerrisk |
| 06:10 | Re: Math error-reporting test scripts useful in glibc? | Agner Fog |
August 22, 2008
| 21:46 | [RFC][PATCH] Prototype for extended printf hooks | Ryan S. Arnold |
August 19, 2008
| 15:41 | swprintf - terminating null in case n < input length | Petr Muller |
| 14:02 | Re: Find out the system calls statically? | River Wang |
| 13:14 | Re: Find out the system calls statically? | Carlos O'Donell |
| 13:04 | Re: Adding a new sub directory and new function | Carlos O'Donell |
| 12:52 | Re: glibc Compilation for ARM | Carlos O'Donell |
| 12:21 | Re: Need help in properly formatting a patch for glibc | Carlos O'Donell |
| 08:58 | Re: Need help in properly formatting a patch for glibc | Denys Vlasenko |
August 18, 2008
| 19:29 | Re: Need help in properly formatting a patch for glibc | Carlos O'Donell |
| 17:03 | Re: Need help in properly formatting a patch for glibc | Denys Vlasenko |
| 15:43 | Re: Need help in properly formatting a patch for glibc | Ryan Arnold |
| 15:33 | Need help in properly formatting a patch for glibc | Denys Vlasenko |
| 09:23 | glibc Compilation for ARM | Akhil |
August 17, 2008
| 17:17 | Adding a new sub directory and new function | wuxi |
| 16:18 | [Fwd: Adding a new sub directory and new function] | wuxi |
August 16, 2008
| 17:24 | Find out the system calls statically? | River Wang |
August 15, 2008
| 01:39 | Re: Intercepting shutdown messges | José Alburquerque |
August 13, 2008
| 20:23 | Intercepting shutdown messges | José Alburquerque |
August 12, 2008
| 21:43 | Re: Build malloc.c shared object? | sam shepperd |
| 18:11 | Re: Build malloc.c shared object? | Ryan Arnold |
| 13:06 | Re: Build malloc.c shared object? | Carlos O'Donell |
August 11, 2008
| 13:40 | Build malloc.c shared object? | sam shepperd |
August 09, 2008
| 08:22 | Re: Why do you want libc to be 5 times slower than other libraries? | Agner Fog |
August 08, 2008
| 12:23 | Re: Why do you want libc to be 5 times slower than other libraries? | Carlos O'Donell |
| 06:19 | Re: Why do you want libc to be 5 times slower than other libraries? | Agner Fog |
| 02:43 | Re: _dlfcn_hook and SHARED | Carlos O'Donell |
| 00:40 | Re: Adding a new function to memcpy.c | Rodrigo Dominguez |
August 07, 2008
| 20:05 | Re: Adding a new function to memcpy.c | Ryan Arnold |
| 19:40 | Adding a new function to memcpy.c | Rodrigo Dominguez |
| 17:53 | Re: Determining if an address is valid prior to using it. | Mark Seaborn |
| 14:37 | Re: libc version librt and timer_create timer_delete | Carlos O'Donell |
| 12:38 | Re: Recompiling sysdeps .S files | Carlos O'Donell |
| 12:33 | Re: Why do you want libc to be 5 times slower than other libraries? | Carlos O'Donell |
| 11:56 | Re: Why do you want libc to be 5 times slower than other libraries? | Agner Fog |
| 11:32 | Re: Why do you want libc to be 5 times slower than other libraries? | Carlos O'Donell |
| 10:15 | Re: CPU dispatching in libc | Agner Fog |
| 10:11 | Re: Why do you want libc to be 5 times slower than other libraries? | Agner Fog |
| 03:41 | Re: Determining if an address is valid prior to using it. | Carlos O'Donell |
| 02:49 | Recompiling sysdeps .S files | Rodrigo Dominguez |
August 06, 2008
| 19:07 | Re: Why do you want libc to be 5 times slower than other libraries? | Ryan S. Arnold |
| 09:38 | Re: [RFH] Math function error-reporting tests | Michael Kerrisk |
| 08:04 | Re: Why do you want libc to be 5 times slower than other libraries? | Agner Fog |
August 05, 2008
| 21:13 | Re: Why do you want libc to be 5 times slower than other libraries? | Carlos O'Donell |
| 16:53 | Re: Why do you want libc to be 5 times slower than other libraries? | Ryan S. Arnold |
| 08:55 | Re: Why do you want libc to be 5 times slower than other libraries? | Arkadiusz Miskiewicz |
| 08:44 | Why do you want libc to be 5 times slower than other libraries? | Agner Fog |
August 04, 2008
| 18:42 | Re: [RFH] Math function error-reporting tests | Michael Kerrisk |
| 17:26 | RE: [RFH] Math function error-reporting tests | GHORBAL Khalil 218205 |
| 15:49 | [RFH] Math function error-reporting tests | Michael Kerrisk |
August 02, 2008
| 11:47 | RE: errors while building glibc-2.7 --> solved | Oussama Chammam |
| 10:50 | Re: FW: errors while building glibc-2.7 --> solved | Nix |
August 01, 2008
| 21:56 | FW: errors while building glibc-2.7 --> solved | Oussama Chammam |
| 06:22 | Memory and string functions can be improved dramatically on x86 andx86-64 | Agner Fog |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]