This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> writes:
> Look for the relocs in libc.so that refer to those symbols. Probably they
> should be calling __read, which already has libc_hidden_proto. If they are
> in code never reached by ISO C-only, then they could legitimately stick to
> read for aesthetic purposes if one really cared, but then you'd need to add
> libc_hidden_proto for read in include/unistd.h, which we haven't needed yet.
> (If they are in low-level linux-specific code, they might want to be using
> INLINE_SYSCALL anyway.)
Thanks - that helped. It was in eventfd_read and write - and I just
noticed that Uli already committed the obvious fix.
The testsuite passes now for me,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform/openSUSE, aj@suse.de
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |