This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix signal.h

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Glibc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:43:19 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix signal.h
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <20041120170623.GH23824@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20041120183159.GI23824@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I think so from reading the standards, but in that case I wonder
> why we test it, e.g.:

Should be non-NULL.  I added the test in the userlevel code because I
wanted to provide the same error handling as if there would be no
userlevel part to the code.  I.e., the kernel will return EINVAL or
EFAULT (don't know which).

- --
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBn5BH2ijCOnn/RHQRAr3mAJ4nEArXNsoyoG2SucCIEAD13Yy9HACgmhzq
FI4HSCSh3PkEEoHeRtRSgW8=
=ljnI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- [PATCH] Fix signal.h
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Fix signal.h
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]