This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: fadvise64_64 for s390-32.

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky at de dot ibm dot com>
Cc: libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 10:16:12 -0800
Subject: Re: fadvise64_64 for s390-32.
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <200312051846.33624.schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin Schwidefsky wrote:

> For s390-64 we do not have the problem because there fadvise64_64
> has only 4 parameters.

s390-64 does not need this syscall.  You're the third 64-bit platform
maintainer making that mistake.  This is a new syscall which is only
needed for 32-bit platforms.  If the kernel defines it for s390-64,
remove it again, it's complete waste.

- -- 
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/0Mts2ijCOnn/RHQRAoo+AJ9SVxy0IkyqBUb/7tejQuSaz7PSxACaA7Vt
z2CSU7ZOL6E7E42+/z86UAc=
=5FiN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- fadvise64_64 for s390-32.
  - From: Martin Schwidefsky

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]