This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix ssize_t definition on s390 32-bit (followup)

From: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>,Glibc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:35:44 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ssize_t definition on s390 32-bit (followup)

> Oops, I've missed typesizes.h in linuxthreads.
> Here is the rest of the patch.

Why do we even have this?  For this:

--- sysdeps/generic/bits/typesizes.h	Tue Mar 25 14:49:32 2003
+++ linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread/bits/typesizes.h	Tue Mar 25 12:39:24 2003
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
 #define __SWBLK_T_TYPE		__SLONGWORD_TYPE
 #define __KEY_T_TYPE		__S32_TYPE
 #define __CLOCKID_T_TYPE	__S32_TYPE
-#define __TIMER_T_TYPE		void *
+#define __TIMER_T_TYPE		__S32_TYPE
 #define __BLKSIZE_T_TYPE	__SLONGWORD_TYPE
 #define __FSID_T_TYPE		struct { int __val[2]; }
 

?  Why not just change generic/bits/typesizes.h and get rid of the
linuxthreads ones altogether?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix ssize_t definition on s390 32-bit (followup)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]