This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: more cancellation work

From: David Mosberger <davidm at napali dot hpl dot hp dot com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com, Glibc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 11:44:24 -0700
Subject: Re: more cancellation work
References: <3F13AB99.9060305@redhat.com><16148.9321.504185.96989@napali.hpl.hp.com><3F143A35.5040906@redhat.com><16148.16484.956221.152133@napali.hpl.hp.com><3F1442AE.4050009@redhat.com>
Reply-to: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com

>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 11:06:38 -0700, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> said:

  Uli> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

  Uli> David Mosberger wrote:

  >> Well, gcc on ia64 _does_ use libunwind.  There is no reason the
  >> same couldn't be true for x86 and all the other platforms (apart
  >> from a small matter of some implementation work...).

  Uli> The current implementatin is just fine and does not have any
  Uli> legal problems attached to it.

Huh?  What "legal problems" does libunwind have?  Care to elaborate?

	--david

Follow-Ups:
- Re: more cancellation work
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

References:
- more cancellation work
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: more cancellation work
  - From: David Mosberger
- Re: more cancellation work
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: more cancellation work
  - From: David Mosberger
- Re: more cancellation work
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]