This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
If that reference is indeed the spec, then this change needs to be made. But before I put it in I am wondering whether there might be any gotchas, i.e. existing binaries that depend on the erroneous behavior. If so, we should do some versioning.
--- Begin Message ---
- From: mark at codesourcery dot com
- To: libc-gnats at gnu dot org, gnats-admin at gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 16:04:31 -0500
- Subject: libc/4926: __cxa_finalize mishandles a NULL dso parameter
- Reply-to: mark at codesourcery dot com
>Number: 4926 >Category: libc >Synopsis: __cxa_finalize mishandles a NULL dso parameter >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: libc-gnats >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: gnatsweb >Arrival-Date: Thu Dec 05 16:04:31 -0500 2002 >Cases: >Originator: mark@codesourcery.com >Release: >Organization: >Environment: >Description: When __cxa_finalize is called with a NULL DSO handle, it should run *all* cleanups; instead it runs none of the cleanups. See: htttp://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/abi.html for the specification of this function. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: Unknown >Unformatted:--- End Message ---
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |