This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Roland McGrath wrote: > Is there any problem with defining the CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID and > CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID macros even on the systems that don't support > them? > I would like to consolidate the bits/time.h files and this is the only > actual difference among any of the supported configurations. In theory it shouldn't be a problem since users have to check _POSIX_CPUTIME and _POSIX_THREAD_CPUTIME first. But there is definitely code out there which will break. I don't have personally problems with this. - -- - --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `--------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9sGlw2ijCOnn/RHQRAgk2AJ0V0+mzZx5GRgaOVhxA00amaR5uAgCfUz7t miCO9JQ1hWNrOJuI5vOxEmw= =pvYV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |