This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:15:45AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 03:30:36PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > Is there any reason why this shouldn't work (ie. does somebody > > > use __pthread_handles before __pthread_initialize_minimal)? > > > Testing still in progress. > > > > Well, test using gdb. I fixed several problems in this area yesterday > > and before but who knows. > > Works just fine (of course provided gdb is pointed > to the right linuxthreads_db if the glibc is not installed yet). > make check passed too. > Will do some more checks to see whether libpthread > memory usage increased because of this (comparing /proc/statm for this version, > version without this patch and version with this patch but > with PTHREAD_THREADS_MAX 1024). These are results from hacking up linuxthreads/Examples/ex2.c, so that it does fgetc(stdin); 95 95 79 2 0 93 16 - .bss, 16384 (this is current CVS + the patch I posted) 95 95 79 2 0 93 16 - .bss, 1024 96 96 79 2 0 94 17 - .data, 1024 (this is current CVS) So it looks like it could make things one page better, not worse. Jakub
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |