This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: nix INTUSE?

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at frob dot com>
Cc: GNU libc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2002 17:41:54 -0700
Subject: Re: nix INTUSE?
References: <20020805003628.5A2021BA18@perdition.linnaean.org>

Roland McGrath wrote:

As far as I can tell, Jakub's new stuff ought to apply just fine to
variables as well as functions.  Despite its name, hidden_proto just does a
declaration with __typeof, so it should do fine for any kind of C symbol.
Can't we use this to get rid of all the INTUSE/INTDEF stuff entirely now?
(And thus to deuglify the code.)

We cannot entirely get rid of it. There are several places where we define special *_internal symbols.

If you want to convert some cases feel free but I'd say there are more important thangs to do.

--
---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nix INTUSE?
  - From: Roland McGrath

References:
- nix INTUSE?
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]