This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Two small fixes for s/390.

From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
To: "Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky at de dot ibm dot com>
Cc: drepper at redhat dot com (Ulrich Drepper),libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:10:56 +0100
Subject: Re: Two small fixes for s/390.
References: <OFDDC1D72E.664E08FE-ONC1256B28.003265C5@de.ibm.com>

"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> writes:

>> This part isn't OK.  We don't use #ifdefs to distinguish between
>> architectures.  Create a separate file or move the existing to 390-64
>> and create a new one in s390-32.
> Ok, I can do that. I'll clean up sysdeps/s390/bits/string.h as well
> because I use the same #ifdef there.

Is that really needed?  For bi-arch support, we should leave
bits/string.h as it is so that you can compile 32-bit and 64-bit apps
with that header...

profile.h is not installed AFAIK and therefore a different story.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two small fixes for s/390.
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

References:
- Re: Two small fixes for s/390.
  - From: Martin Schwidefsky

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]