This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: glibc 2.2 and versions in libc and linuxthreads

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>
Subject: Re: glibc 2.2 and versions in libc and linuxthreads
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 09 Nov 2000 17:58:39 -0800
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <20001109174321.A25539@valinux.com>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

"H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com> writes:

> I'd like to resolve this:
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2000-11/msg00057.html
> 
> before it is too late. I think this bug may be unique to Linux.

All tries of you to handle this I've seen so far are wrong.  There
must not be any assumption being made on the version names in
different DSOs.  Initially we thought about using different names
altogether but dropped the idea.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.2 and versions in libc and linuxthreads
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- glibc 2.2 and versions in libc and linuxthreads
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]