This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: A patch for stdio-common/sprintf.c

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>
Subject: Re: A patch for stdio-common/sprintf.c
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 16 Oct 2000 15:00:13 -0700
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <20001016105647.A20132@valinux.com>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

"H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com> writes:

> We use ... in stdio-common/fprintf.c. Wny not do it for
> stdio-common/sprintf.c?

Well, if you would say why you want to see this change the decision
would be easier.  I don't know why it's using K&R syntax but I cannot
exclude that it is for a reason.  Is the current code failing
somewhere?

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A patch for stdio-common/sprintf.c
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- A patch for stdio-common/sprintf.c
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]