This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: <bits/libc-lock.h> and <bp-sym.h>

To: Greg McGary <greg at mcgary dot org>
Subject: Re: <bits/libc-lock.h> and <bp-sym.h>
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:50:17 +0200
Cc: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <20000716202546.A5629@valinux.com> <ms7lal17hm.fsf@mcgary.org>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 01:33:25AM -0700, Greg McGary wrote:
> "H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com> writes:
> 
> > <bits/libc-lock.h> includes <bp-sym.h> and uses BP_SYM. But <bp-sym.h>
> > is not found anywhere.
> 
> For what compilation does it fail?

I think H.J. is using some older glibc from Red Hat rawhide which was made
at the time when bp-sym.h was included unconditionally in libc-lock.h,
right?
This has been fixed since.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: <bits/libc-lock.h> and <bp-sym.h>
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- <bits/libc-lock.h> and <bp-sym.h>
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: <bits/libc-lock.h> and <bp-sym.h>
  - From: Greg McGary

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]