This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 10:32:01AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >>>>> Ulrich Drepper writes: > > Uli> Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com> writes: > >> Conversely, perhaps ldconfig should use ${prefix}-based file names when > >> ${prefix}!=/usr so that you would get a separate ld.so.cache universe for > >> your separate libc installation. > > Uli> Volunteers? > > Yes. Here's a patch. Ok to commit? Also, Andreas, could ldconfig be made a little bit more silent unless -v is given to it? It complains without -v about several things H.J.'s ldconfig complained with -v only, and people seem to be really confused by that. Would you mind if I moved some of the error calls undef opt_verbose if? It confuses people e.g. when using rpm when foo package contains the shared library and foo-devel a .so symlink to it, then there is always some time when both are upgraded when some symlink is stale (either points to the older or newer library) and if ldconfig is called during that time period, it complains. Jakub
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |