This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Hi, On Sun, Jan 23, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 05:49:25PM +0100, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > > same time, and not months later. > > > > Cristian, I hope the patch is ok for you ? > > We have this in the tree (sorry for not posting it here but it was a very > last patch I mailed before I went home). > I have reverted even signedness rlim_t changes because it really does not > fix anything, it is just a new feature, but I have kept the @GLIBC_2.1.3 > symbols, so that binaries already compiled against it continue to work and > we don't have to change that symbol in 2.1.90 (but symbols @GLIBC_2.0 are > default). No, I think this is the wrong way. We should remove the setrlimit@GLIBC_2.1.3 symbols, too. It is no problem to break binary compatiblity with test versions. But to let the 2.1.3 version in is ugly and not necessary. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de SuSE GmbH Schanzaeckerstr. 10 90443 Nuernberg Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse, cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |