Re: [PATCH] 2.3.39+ IPC for glibc 2.2

[Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>]

On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 09:53:34PM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> One more thing: I think the definitions protected by
> __LIBC_IPC_INTERNAL should be moved into an internal header and not
> being public.  If they have to be able for some user-level code then
> the symbol name should be changed.

The IPCOP_* definitions can be very easily moved into a non-public header
because they are identical on all platforms anyway.
With the __old_* structure definitions, I wonder if they can stay
unprotected in the public headers or whether I should write sys/msgpriv.h
and the like headers which will include sys/msg.h and declare the private
things. Having both structures in the same file makes things more readable
and easier to compare how it has changed, but if it would be a problem, I
can move it away.

Cheers,
    Jakub
___________________________________________________________________
Jakub Jelinek | jakub@redhat.com | http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/~jj
Linux version 2.3.39 on a sparc64 machine (1343.49 BogoMips)
___________________________________________________________________