This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
>>>>> Ulrich Drepper writes: > Hi, > I've checked in a little program I wrote one or two years ago. It > allows profiling to use of memory allocation (heap and stack). A > preloadable module generates some binary output which is then > transformed into a graphic by another program. > The unusual thing about this addition is that the program depends on a > library not part of glibc. There is a configure test to test whether > the program can be generated but for bootstrapping this is of course > not possible. But I really don't care that much about this case and > have added a Makefile rule to still allow generating the program > afterwards. I only see one problem: Where do distributions put the include files and libraries? Your configure test doesn't work for SuSE which uses /usr/include/gd/ and /usr/lib/libgd.a. Before I change the configure test, I'd like to get feedback from other distributors about the location of libgd files. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |