This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: suseconds_t and struct timeval

To: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu)
Subject: Re: suseconds_t and struct timeval
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>
Date: 29 Jul 1999 13:03:52 -0700
Cc: libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com (GNU C Library)
References: <19990729194852.261BD57BA@ocean.lucon.org>
Reply-To: drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper)

hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu) writes:

> According to the Unix standard, suseconds_t should be used in
> struct timeval. Why doesn't glibc use it?

Why don't you first look before complaining?

-- 
---------------.      drepper at gnu.org  ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com   `------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: suseconds_t and struct timeval
  - From: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu)

References:
- suseconds_t and struct timeval
  - From: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]