This is the mail archive of the
libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: __stat: should it end up as UND in libc.so or not?
- To: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu)
- Subject: Re: __stat: should it end up as UND in libc.so or not?
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>
- Date: 11 Dec 1998 08:33:56 -0800
- Cc: Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com (Franz Sirl), libc-alpha@cygnus.com
- References: <m0zoTLS-0000UXC@sea.lucon.org>
- Reply-To: drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper)
hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu) writes:
> It must be a PPC bug in glibc since __stat is never defined for
> libc.so. I didn't find any reference to __stat in libc, at least
> not on x86.
Well, it could also be a remaining bug in the libc.
We were careful to use in the libc code explicit calls to __xstat
instead of __stat or use a macro __stat to allow compiling without
optimization. Please find out which file this comes from and make
sure it is either a __xstat call or the header with the __stat
definition is used.
--
---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com `------------------------