This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: glibc-2.0.99 build problems

To: Geoff Keating <geoffk@ozemail.com.au>
Subject: Re: glibc-2.0.99 build problems
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>
Date: 27 Oct 1998 12:26:06 -0800
Cc: howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu, libc-alpha@cygnus.com, geoffk@geoffk.wattle.id.au
References: <9810240054.ZM13661@bromo.med.uc.edu> <199810260002.LAA00865@geoffk.wattle.id.au> <r23e8c3pto.fsf@happy.cygnus.com> <199810272013.HAA00750@geoffk.wattle.id.au>
Reply-To: drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper)

Geoff Keating <geoffk@ozemail.com.au> writes:

> This is a multiple-choice patch.  Please choose one of the two below.
> I think the first is the more correct choice, because this is how the
> functions are declared in the kernel source.

We cannot cheat on the INLINE_SYSCALL macro and simply pass a 64bit
value.  Therefore this patch is out.  I haven't applied your previous
patch for this exact reason.

-- 
---------------.      drepper at gnu.org  ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com   `------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc-2.0.99 build problems
  - From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@ozemail.com.au>

References:
- glibc-2.0.99 build problems
  - From: "Jack Howarth" <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
- Re: glibc-2.0.99 build problems
  - From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: glibc-2.0.99 build problems
  - From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>
- Re: glibc-2.0.99 build problems
  - From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@ozemail.com.au>

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]