This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: 2.31: < 2 weeks to go
- From: Carlos O'Donell <codonell at redhat dot com>
- To: cltang at codesourcery dot com, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>, GLIBC Devel <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Arjun Shankar <ashankar at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 14:29:14 -0500
- Subject: Re: 2.31: < 2 weeks to go
- References: <0645ee7d-59c9-cb2f-ebe5-ef613c8094cf@gotplt.org> <3ba1511a-94ac-6b43-0288-1ef157796fba@redhat.com> <31d7e687-c427-6226-e40c-04561651786e@mentor.com>
On 12/24/19 9:36 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> On 2019/12/20 12:56 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> Chung-Lin,
>>
>> I suggest you also put the dynamic loader improvements on the blocker
>> list. I've been look at these for months, and I haven't found anything
>> really wrong with them. I need to post my review writeup, but I keep
>> getting blocked. I'm going to do that either tomorrow or next week.
>
> Thanks! I just added it to the 2.31 release Wiki page.
I finished my review, but in hindsight I've seen at least one odd
sorting which worries me, and so I think we need to move this to early
2.32. We should keep moving the review forward and aim to commit early
in February. This gives us the biggest window for finding problems.
In summary:
- Move ld.so improvements to 2.32.
- Aim to commit them in February.
Chung-Lin,
Would you like to split up the work a bit? I could take a look at
expanding the python syntax?
--
Cheers,
Carlos.