This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [X-POST] patchwork.sourceware.org refresh
- From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin at linuxfoundation dot org>
- To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>
- Cc: Christian Brauner <christian dot brauner at ubuntu dot com>, Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>, GLIBC Devel <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, help-guix at gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 11:52:22 -0500
- Subject: Re: [X-POST] patchwork.sourceware.org refresh
- References: <78c774ef-9f9c-3339-aeb8-84636ee94360@gotplt.org> <d6b8afad-7c98-c23f-aca9-e81072ecdfe4@gotplt.org> <87y2vnxbk2.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20191208122116.ae5wl4eytedt54vg@wittgenstein> <821c81bd-3c9a-0d33-ffbe-924de796dc7e@gotplt.org>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 01:26:16PM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On 08/12/19 5:51 pm, Christian Brauner wrote:
> >> Maybe we can use <https://patchwork.kernel.org/> for temporary
> >> hosting? It already covers some non-kernel lists.
> >
> > If this is an option you'd probably need to talk to Konstantin about
> > this.
Hi, all:
I'm not sure it makes that much sense to put glibc on
patchwork.kernel.org. I know we have some non-kernel projects there, but
they are pretty tiny and were approved largely because they wouldn't
make much of an impact on kernel.org infra.
The same wouldn't be true for glibc, especially if we're talking bot and
CI integration. It really needs to stay on its own dedicated
infrastructure where it can be properly scoped and resourced.
Sorry that I don't have a better answer.
Best,
-K