Re: Help with lv_LV sorting?

[Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>]

On 11/19/19 7:34 PM, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> 19.11.2019 15:16 Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Mike, Rafal,
>>
>> Could either of you please review an lv_LV sorting issue?
>>
>> We have had a report that the lv_LV sorting is incorrect.
>>
>> I have filed this bug based on our downstream Fedora discussion:
>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25206
>>
>> Thank you!
> 
> Thanks for heads up, Carlos.  The work on sorting was done by Mike
> so I believe he would be better and faster fixing this than me.
> The previous bug report was 15537. [1]
> 
> In the downstream [2] the OP says that the bug was introduced during
> the 2.25 release cycle.  Mike's work was in 2.27 release cycle.  There
> were no important changes in the sorting rules before that.
> 
> Unfortunately, I am unable to take a closer look at the issue
> before the weekend.

No worries, thanks for taking a quick look.

I also won't get around to it until next week.

I have a 3 deep queue of patches for Red Hat, CodeSourcery, and
then my C.UTF-8 work to look at. I thought maybe one of you or
Mike might have already seen something like this.
 
> [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15537
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696729#c0
> 


-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.