This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2 05/30] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Test double values

From: Paul E Murphy <murphyp at linux dot ibm dot com>
To: "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" <gabriel at inconstante dot net dot br>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 10:15:24 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/30] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Test double values
References: <20191025153410.15405-1-gabriel@inconstante.net.br> <20191025153410.15405-6-gabriel@inconstante.net.br>



On 10/25/19 10:33 AM, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:

From: "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" <gabrielftg@linux.ibm.com>

No changes since v1.

-- 8< --
A single format string can take double and long double parameters at the
same time.  Internally, these parameters are routed to the same
function, which correctly reads them and calls the underlying functions
responsible for the actual conversion to string.  This patch adds a new
case to test this scenario.

Tested for powerpc64le.

I think the contents of the patch look OK. However, I am curious, whathidden behavior is being verified by these tests? I would expect thebehavior of any non long-double arguments to be unchanged based on thispatch series.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]