This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] sysdeps/wait: Use the waitid syscall if required


On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:35 AM Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 08:54:08AM -0700, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 5:24 AM Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 03:55:14PM -0700, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > > > If the waitpid and wait4 syscalls aren't avaliable (such as y2038 safe
> > > > 32-bit systems) let us use the waitid syscall isntead.
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately waitid is substantially differnt to waitpid and wait4, so
> > > > the conversion ends up being complex.
> > > >
> > > > For full support we need the 5.4+ kernel as that allows a pid of 0 with
> > > > the P_PGID idtype.
> > > >
> > > > 2019-09-16  Alistair Francis  <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> > > >
> > > >       * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wait.c: Use the waitid syscall if required.
> > > >       * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c: Likewise.
> > > >       * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid_nocancel.c: Likewise.
> > >
> > > If wait4 is not available, shouldn't it be emulated as well as waitpid?
> >
> > Yes, it is by the changed in wait.c.
>
> This change of wait.c affects __libc_wait only, I don't see how it makes
> wait4 emulated.

I'm not clear on what you mean. Do you mean the direct syscall from
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list?

Alistair

>
>
> --
> ldv


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]