This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Speedup nptl/tst-rwlock19.
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Stefan Liebler <stli at linux dot ibm dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:14:44 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Speedup nptl/tst-rwlock19.
- References: <63377b64-9da9-0588-e3d5-92a4f1a1e6d0@linux.ibm.com>
On 9/12/19 8:16 AM, Stefan Liebler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the test creates 15 threads which are trying 5000x to pthread_rwlock_rdlock
> a modified lock where the number of readers is set to max - 5. If locked
> successfully, it sleeps for 1ms.
>
> The test succeeds if the lock was rdlock'ed successfully for at least
> one time and it has failed at least once with EAGAIN and the
> number of readers needs to be max - 5 again after all threads have joined.
>
> The test is currently running for 5 seconds. Thus this patch reduces
> the READTRIES from 5000 to 100 and is increasing the DELAY from 1ms to 5ms.
> Then the test runs for roughly 0.5 seconds.
Why do we need to limit the retries?
The point of the test is to run until we see a successful lock, and a failed
lock with EAGAIN.
It should be possible to make this test robust and so that when we run it
on slower i686 it should jus run until it sees the events it needs to see,
or fail from timeout (indicating a problem).
I'm worried that by limiting the retires we'll see failures on slower or
loaded hardware in the lab, and then we'll have to go back and bump up the
retries again.
The optimal test in my mind is:
- Run forever.
- Look for events of interest.
- Exit success when those events are seen.
- Fail if we timeout.
--
Cheers,
Carlos.