This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [RFC v5 00/21] RISC-V glibc port for the 32-bit
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Alistair Francis <alistair dot francis at wdc dot com>
- Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, <arnd at arndb dot de>, <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, <fweimer at redhat dot com>, <palmer at sifive dot com>, <macro at wdc dot com>, <zongbox at gmail dot com>, <alistair23 at gmail dot com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 17:28:27 +0000
- Subject: Re: [RFC v5 00/21] RISC-V glibc port for the 32-bit
- Ironport-sdr: neUem/Xel1Jo3l0iykOK5d0o1EPrp4whxb+Pah1gmzi29WtleAHkksQ2ZEjUt6WCxiaf0YNM81 LEeJxwHayIbHzw4dxO60tCjSHzKCwcF2kh3+g2l6gg5Z5v+45DEez4TM6Orsv1FKRFP1ULwrsV 2/gN6FQ3ZYtuWbagEIYi5mDoLJyQ0eja4d1MaV3zTftZLchDfVGeUI/sq5WPLgvQ6HjnaDyGCO acr0WlkwT1WYD43OZ/S12v28nsJ69U63EvUr65M//paohUubnPTt7qceYVLMeJqMETRSmJjpTn /NE=
- Ironport-sdr: a+MuxVBo4p18Dt2KRTV5MgD7H+ojNCQG4zCvVVF22nxZ3Lc8PONNnqwhHoSQThva83uxMWNKqQ bBSxx2Qu6LAERLw1/reLKS67YelkTRR+cx1RkLoXV0oU8803s7wcaWqI/eRiYUChnO2/hW/bd0 pDsVrRv4tHrfjb53MUhAXVwv0BSn0Jm8kxrqlwxbE98TKR0Zgfh1fZBAn6FZOj9NZ3V8QCRGVj Pkab2/pk2TzHW2BmG39dijqLCu+0JArKJiVElprJAgX+MNyykXUANuEA5VSJnSxlVmgHGFT/KA 8es=
- References: <cover.1567097252.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com>
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Alistair Francis wrote:
> All testing has been done on a 5.3 kernel with these two patches back
> ported from linux-next:
> - pidfd: add P_PIDFD to waitid()
> - waitid: Add support for waiting for the current process group
> to fix the waitid() syscall race.
>
> Issues still to address:
> - Wait for Lukasz's patche series mentioned above to be merged (2)
> - Get the RV32 tests running. At the moment the tests are hanging and
> I'm trying to investigate.
> - Rebased on the clock_gettime series [4] on list once it is merged.
- Test the patches affecting architecture-independent code in several
different configurations (for other architectures) that cover the
time-related variants, as I listed at
<https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-08/msg00234.html>, and give the
details of those variants when submitting the patch series, so we can have
confidence that the main time-related variants have been tested
sufficiently.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com