This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 12/12] Revise the documentation of ‘simple calendar time’.
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>
- To: Paul Eggert <eggert at cs dot ucla dot edu>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx dot de>, Alistair Francis <alistair23 at gmail dot com>, Stepan Golosunov <stepan at golosunov dot pp dot ru>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb dot de>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 16:22:53 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] Revise the documentation of ‘simple calendar time’.
- References: <20190820132152.24100-1-zackw@panix.com> <20190820132152.24100-13-zackw@panix.com> <e629c22a-9b1e-bda8-5c9f-a1951cfee96f@cs.ucla.edu> <CAKCAbMiJ-7uT1+Arm=LA_8sGVBmPOaVbYbrN7Kn8J5zWnMFu9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 4:18 PM Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote:
> Using microseconds for the intermediate figure was also intentional;
> it emphasizes that the resolution of the clock is a real number
> independent of the units in which clock_getres reports it.
I meant to say "physical measurement" where I wrote "real number", here.
zw