This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Alistair, > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:47 AM Alistair Francis > <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:23 AM Joseph Myers > > <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Joseph, > > > > > > > > Do you have any more comments regarding the > > > > __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALL flag patch [1] ? > > > > > > I think it still needs major editing for clarity as well as > > > idiomatic English usage. Rather than sending a long list of > > > detailed issues with particular words and phrases it probably > > > makes more sense for me (or another native speaker with good > > > familiarity with all the issues involved) to do that editing; I > > > hope to look at that around August / September / October if > > > no-one else does it first. > > > > I'm a native English speaker and I think I now have a good sense of > > what is going on, would it help if I read through it and send an > > updated version? > > I had a go at it anyway, this is the updated comment I came up with: > > /* Support for the 64-bit time Linux kernel syscalls. > > This flag indicates support for Linux kernel syscalls, which are > able to handle the 64 bit time ABI. It is defined for all 64-bit > architectures as they have always supported 64 bit time support. It > is also defined for all 32-bit architectures when using Linux kernel > version 5.1 or newer. > > When __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS is defined glibc should call the > *64/time64 suffixed syscalls. These should be #defined to the the > unsuffixed versions when required (such as when running on 64-bit > systems). > > __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS being defined does not mean that > __TIMESIZE is 64-bit. In cases where the __TIMESIZE is 64-bit the > 64-bit syscalls can be used directly. In cases where __TIMESIZE is > 32-bit conversions between the original 32-bit values and the > kernel's 64-bit values will need to occur. > > As an example - the syscall to set clock (clock_settime) - if the > __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS is defined, it indicates that 64 bit time > can be set in the system. > > On systems with __WORDSIZE == 64 the __NR_clock_settime syscall is > used to achieve this goal. Contrary, systems with __WORDSIZE == 32 do > use new __NR_clock_settime64 syscall available from Linux version 5.1. > > The __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS is defined for: > > 1. Systems with intrinsic 64 bit time support (__WORDSIZE == 64). > > 2. For x32 architecture, which is a special case in respect to 64 > bit time support (it has __WORDSIZE==32 but __TIMESIZE==64) > > 3. Systems with __WORDSIZE==32, which gain 64 bit time support > with new set of syscalls added to Linux kernel 5.1. > > 4. All new 32-bit architectures that only support 64-bit time, > such as RV32. */ > Thanks for providing the new description. Let's wait for comments from glibc community members. > Alistair > > > > > > Alistair > > > > > > > > -- > > > Joseph S. Myers > > > joseph@codesourcery.com Best regards, Lukasz Majewski -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de
Attachment:
pgpaDi9NhaL41.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |