This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.30 - 6 days until ABI freeze.
On 09/07/2019 15:04, Mike Crowe wrote:
> On Friday 05 July 2019 at 16:38:37 +0100, Mike Crowe wrote:
>> On Thursday 04 July 2019 at 16:41:27 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Adhemerval Zanella:
>>>
>>>> My take initial take was to add _np, but after a chat with Joseph's on
>>>> IRC I think we should add them as expected names. Florian has raised
>>>> some concerns.
>>>
>>> Please feel free to disregard what I said if Joseph has a different
>>> opinion.
>>
>> Adhemerval, does that mean we have consensus to use the unadorned names or
>> do we need more people to comment?
>
> In addition, if the consensus is that the functions should be added with
> the _np suffixes then would it be better to do that in a single new patch
> or to modify each of the existing (but already reviewed) patches? I had a
> go at modifying the individual patches to be prepared and the abilist
> files cause a lot of conflicts when a function is renamed. :(
I think unadorned should be simpler and should generated less trouble.
Carlos, do I have an 'ok' to push it on master?