This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] dlfcn: Avoid one-element flexible array in Dl_serinfo


The dls_serpath path field, as an array of length 1, introduces
unexpected array subscript checks with some compilers.

GCC versions before 3.0 treat the nested anonymous union as a
declaration of an unnamed type, and not as a member declaration,
so this construct cannot be used for these compilers.

2019-06-03  Florian Weimer  <fweimer@redhat.com>

	[BZ #24166]
	* dlfcn/dlfcn.h (Dl_serinfo): Do not use array of length 1 for
	dls_serpath field.

diff --git a/dlfcn/dlfcn.h b/dlfcn/dlfcn.h
index 896ad6fc9b..c550371999 100644
--- a/dlfcn/dlfcn.h
+++ b/dlfcn/dlfcn.h
@@ -180,7 +180,19 @@ typedef struct
 {
   size_t dls_size;		/* Size in bytes of the whole buffer.  */
   unsigned int dls_cnt;		/* Number of elements in `dls_serpath'.  */
+# if __GNUC_PREREQ (3, 0)
+  /* The zero-length array avoids an unwanted array subscript check by
+     the compiler, while the surrounding anonymous union preserves the
+     historic size of the type.  At the time of writing, GNU C does
+     not support structs with flexible array members in unions.  */
+  __extension__ union
+  {
+    Dl_serpath dls_serpath[0]; /* Actually longer, dls_cnt elements.  */
+    Dl_serpath __dls_serpath_pad[1];
+  };
+# else
   Dl_serpath dls_serpath[1];	/* Actually longer, dls_cnt elements.  */
+# endif
 } Dl_serinfo;
 #endif /* __USE_GNU */
 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]