This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Remove ioperm etc. support for arm (was: Re: _ioperm support for Arm)

From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro dot koskinen at iki dot fi>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
Cc: Phil Blundell <pb at pbcl dot net>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 21:40:28 +0300
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove ioperm etc. support for arm (was: Re: _ioperm support for Arm)
References: <87o93lo3y9.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190529135135.rt3c5fhhser7fik6@hetzner.pbcl.net> <875zptqrwx.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190529141820.5nny64ugrvqyzqgd@hetzner.pbcl.net> <87r28hpb0l.fsf_-_@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>

Hi,

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 04:53:46PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> For libc.so.6 on arm-linux-gnueabi (as built by build-many-glibcs.py),
> readelf shows this:
> 
> Attribute Section: aeabi
> File Attributes
>   Tag_CPU_name: "5T"
>   Tag_CPU_arch: v5T

Doesn't this depend on what is the default in the toolchain (GCC)
being used? Looking at this script it enforces arch for some variants,
but not for plain arm-linux-gnueabi.

A.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Remove ioperm etc. support for arm
  - From: Florian Weimer

References:
- _ioperm support for Arm
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: _ioperm support for Arm
  - From: Phil Blundell
- Re: _ioperm support for Arm
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: _ioperm support for Arm
  - From: Phil Blundell
- [PATCH] Remove ioperm etc. support for arm (was: Re: _ioperm support for Arm)
  - From: Florian Weimer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]