This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v4] Prepare vfprintf to use __printf_fp/__printf_fphex with float128 arg



On 20/05/2019 16:16, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2019, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> 
>>> Well, I intentionally write small patches that are valid for master, so
>>> they can be applied sooner than later.  I have written many patches this
>>> way to avoid the burden of carrying patches on personal branches.
>>>
>>> I also provided a link to such branch where the changes in this patch
>>> get tested for many of the functions added by subsequent patches.
>>>
>>> I was hoping that these things combined would provide a good
>>> justification for acceptance.  With that in mind, do you have an
>>> objection to this patch?
>>
>> My main objection is currently glibc still does not support -mabi=ieeelongdouble
>> (correct me if I wrong), so it might take some time to actually test this
>> code path on powerpc. 
> 
> I think this is a case where the preparatory patch is sufficiently 
> self-contained that it is reasonable to have is on master separately from 
> others that depend on it.  (This is not a review or approval of the 
> details of the specific patch.  And for some patches, even when they are 
> reasonable to include on their own, the review of the design of the patch 
> may depend on looking at the later patches in the series to see how much 
> the design is forced by requirements that aren't obvious from the patch in 
> isolation.)
> 

Alright then, I withdrew my objection.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]