This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: add libmvec implementations of log and logf

From: Shawn Landden <slandden at gmail dot com>
To: GT <tnggil at protonmail dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 09:59:09 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: add libmvec implementations of log and logf
References: <20190505203438.28140-1-shawn@git.icu> <20190506203210.8536-1-shawn@git.icu> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1905071516230.3445@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

Hi,

On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:21 AM Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> Since you and Bert Tenjy have now posted rival patch versions implementing
> vector log, a key performance comparison would be against the version
> posted by Bert Tenjy
> <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-05/msg00054.html> - and in
> general, you should compare and contrast the two versions of log to
> justify why one might be better than another.  It's also important in such
> cases to be very clear about where exactly the patch you are posting fits
> into exactly what other patch series.
Bert,

Are you working on pow/powf?

Shawn

References:
- [RFC][PATCH] powerpc: add libmvec implementations of log and logf
  - From: Shawn Landden
- [PATCH] powerpc: add libmvec implementations of log and logf
  - From: Shawn Landden
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc: add libmvec implementations of log and logf
  - From: Joseph Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]