This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] strftime: Allow use of both 'E' and 'O' like "%OEy", "%OEY" [BZ #24453]


Hello Paul-san,

From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] strftime: Allow use of both 'E' and 'O' like "%OEy", "%OEY" [BZ #24453]
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:54:30 -0700

> On 4/17/19 2:10 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > I think we should support only the spellings %EO and %OE, without
> > repetition.
> 
> Why not support just %EO for now, and continue to reject %OE? That would
> allow more space for future extensions. Plus it would make the proposed
> code a bit simpler and faster.

I agree with this proposal.  However, I would like to support just %OE
and continue to reject %EO.  Because, %OE* is a variant of %E*.

Regards,
TAMUKI Shoichi


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]