This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: New failure on aarch64 in Fedora Rawhide.
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Carlos O'Donell <codonell at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:04:17 +0200
- Subject: Re: New failure on aarch64 in Fedora Rawhide.
- References: <bf1c5fb5-510f-8cc6-89d9-d3ca9e03ae8f@redhat.com>
On Apr 09 2019, Carlos O'Donell <codonell@redhat.com> wrote:
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2880/34082880/build.log
>
> BUILDSTDERR: In file included from ../sysdeps/aarch64/sysdep.h:22,
> BUILDSTDERR: from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/sysdep.h:26,
> BUILDSTDERR: from ../sysdeps/aarch64/nptl/tls.h:37,
> BUILDSTDERR: from ../include/errno.h:25,
> BUILDSTDERR: from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netlink_assert_response.c:19:
> BUILDSTDERR: ../sysdeps/generic/sysdep.h:81: error: "CFI_RESTORE" redefined [-Werror]
> BUILDSTDERR: 81 | # define CFI_RESTORE(reg) \
> BUILDSTDERR: |
> BUILDSTDERR: In file included from ../sysdeps/unix/sysdep.h:18,
> BUILDSTDERR: from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/sysdep.h:25,
> BUILDSTDERR: from ../sysdeps/aarch64/nptl/tls.h:37,
> BUILDSTDERR: from ../include/errno.h:25,
> BUILDSTDERR: from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netlink_assert_response.c:19:
> BUILDSTDERR: ../sysdeps/generic/sysdep.h:81: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> BUILDSTDERR: 81 | # define CFI_RESTORE(reg) \
> BUILDSTDERR: |
> BUILDSTDERR: cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> This just came up in Fedora Rawhide.
I don't see that failure, and I don't understand why the compiler
complains. The definitions should be 100% identical. Why doesn't the
compiler complain about the other macro redefinitions?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."