This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64: HWCAP: add support for AT_HWCAP2
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 09:32:55AM +0100, Andrew Murray wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:58:31PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Andrew Murray wrote:
[...]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > > index aa4ec53281ce..6cc8aff83805 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > > @@ -833,7 +833,11 @@ static void arch_timer_evtstrm_enable(int divider)
> > > cntkctl |= (divider << ARCH_TIMER_EVT_TRIGGER_SHIFT)
> > > | ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_EVT_EN;
> > > arch_timer_set_cntkctl(cntkctl);
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> > > + cpu_set_named_feature(EVTSTRM);
> > > +#else
> > > elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_EVTSTRM;
> > > +#endif
> >
> > I wonder whether we can have a generic definition for this:
> >
> > #define cpu_set_named_feature(x) (elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_ ## x)
>
> You mean specific to arm32?
>
> I will do this, along with a cpu_get_named_feature - but I think I'd prefer
> to do this in a separate series.
Yes, we could do that. We could also do it more widely, but it's
probably not worth the overhead of doing it.
[...]
Cheers
---Dave