This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Restartable Sequences support for glibc 2.30
- From: Carlos O'Donell <codonell at redhat dot com>
- To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu dot desnoyers at efficios dot com>, Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:34:45 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Restartable Sequences support for glibc 2.30
- References: <20190212194253.1951-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
On 2/12/19 2:42 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
The only point that still appears to not reach concensus is whether it's
acceptable to define the RSEQ_SIG code signature for each architecture.
If I missed other points that failed to reach concensus, please let me
know!
I have no objection to RSEQ_SIG being a signature that each architecture uses.
Can you summarize the previous discussions here?
--
Cheers,
Carlos.