This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Fw: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH] PPC64: First in the series of patches implementing
- From: GT <tnggil at protonmail dot com>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, "libc-alpha at sourceware dot org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom at linux dot ibm dot com>, Jeffrey Scheel <scheel at us dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 17:20:49 +0000
- Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH] PPC64: First in the series of patches implementing
- References: <CAGWvnykktWuDVLrMrOiLrGV9aOUUQNd8Bf1FiiWbQ_G-aXJyvQ@mail.gmail.com> <Va5DLyFouG-pOYSW0osnuTg2RRjCEsQF6mYXCKNTFZSE4h0fX0kAOkH8-0EMivO0tMrSn-T2jK7GBNBcQnI_vjkMjgeb7sjPscHVOlqf_ao=@protonmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903012207200.29803@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <pY1zcuIUDeySpFynMv979KQmb37qfZnrcQ98ldKaG5znsTC5i2CocB1NC_YdIV3SDxRr4x8AAYTL2bih3rlKv6wP7V1wLSHawwZRc1KCLHw=@protonmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903012354330.29803@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <_tezejCH0vYrGXfP1IeMTR6g0HK034WMZfvem-g9O-_OzFYr6LnkLIIVQCooAxxGQOEt21ffWRRhngLBZO8qqrTkvVTck4YoDnUcQEmfxy4=@protonmail.com> <CAGWvny=7zgsoi56YmyP8-_8xkhw_-KMm+g8JuDyL-hEyHVxTvg@mail.gmail.com> <N6kmy1CnEKz5wrqCSs1fTdqLzepvHZWHRcflz_5lYeS07m0HbvF4WblUXQbUGDh0vgjOvLjlrcIJcJ9X5QoQX_kN6rQ4bhQ5xBwgDZUhI7A=@protonmail.com> <CAGWvnynLSR=-aK7eiWGgxVm6F_nLVjxq0c37m9M-GeMDOgeTNw@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: GT <tnggil at protonmail dot com>
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, March 6, 2019 2:52 PM, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bert,
>
> You need to send a new patch that responds to the reply:
>
> > Right now it does export an ABI (meaning both the library symbols, and the
> > declarations in bits/math-vector.h that are expected to be interpreted by
> > a future compiler as meaning, in accordance with the ABI document that
> > needs to be written, that those library symbols are available -
> > bits/math-vector.h being installed regardless of whether the library is
> > built).
>
> Agreed. That has to be modified in the next patch submission.
>
> Thanks, David
>
1. The text referenced was not the last word on what changes if any are to be
made concerning the ABI. Start at this message and follow the references:
https://www.sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-03/msg00036.html
2. There are repeated references to a branch that will be the home of the
patches until they can be merged into glibc master. What is the exact process
for creating the branch? Who is supposed to create it?