This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] ARC: Atomics and Locking primitives

From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vineet dot gupta1 at synopsys dot com>, <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, <linux-snps-arc at lists dot infradead dot org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:04:22 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] ARC: Atomics and Locking primitives
References: <1548811555-24373-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1548811555-24373-6-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <mvmpnse8s6s.fsf@suse.de>

On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> On Jan 29 2019, Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote:
> 
> > +#define __PTHREAD_MUTEX_NUSERS_AFTER_KIND  1
> > +#define __PTHREAD_MUTEX_USE_UNION          1
> 
> New ports should use the preferred values for these macros.

This seems like something that could be a common issue for new ports, so 
worth a mention at <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/NewPorts> alongside 
such things as using init_array and USE_ATOMIC_COMPILER_BUILTINS.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] ARC: Atomics and Locking primitives
  - From: Vineet Gupta

References:
- [PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors
  - From: Vineet Gupta
- [PATCH v2 05/15] ARC: Atomics and Locking primitives
  - From: Vineet Gupta
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] ARC: Atomics and Locking primitives
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]