This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v11] Locales: Cyrillic -> ASCII transliteration [BZ #2872]


27.12.2018 02:30 Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org> wrote:
> 
> On 26/12/18 5:43 PM, Egor Kobylkin wrote:
> [...]
> > Rafal has requested help and guidance about this patch in another email
> > to this list [1]. I hope other members would chime in on that in time
> > for 2.29. I understand we need input from those involved in C locale
> > that is compiled into the libc binaries (as opposed to the rest of
> > locales that are shipped in plain text, not compiled).
> 
> Ah OK, I missed that email.  It'll have to wait for more inputs though 
> because like I said, I don't have enough experience in locales to make 
> an intelligent comment, definitely not for Cyrillic.

My email is here:

https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-12/msg00787.html

My questions are not related with Cyrillic but in general how
transliteration should be implemented.  You may replace "Cyrillic"
with any other script you know and ask yourself "how would I implement
transliteration from Foo Alphabet to ASCII".

I think that so far there was no transliteration common for all
locales except translit_combine which just removes the combining
diacritic characters.

Can we have any live meeting, like on IRC?  I think that we could have
more questions answered in direct conversation.  By email we can have
little more than one question and answer per day.

> > @Rafal - I know you have asked to drop your email from To: as you are
> > getting them through your list subscription and so twice. But I guess
> > To: is still helpful to see who is involved. I am not subscribed to the
> > list myself, so I would like my email to be kept on To: or CC: for this.
> 
> I added @Rafal because it's kinda standard practice to do that to get an 
> individual's attention since otherwise an email could get lost in the 
> traffic.  @Rafal, I'll remove it if you object.

I don't object here.  Previously I was complaining about large patches
which arrive in two copies and tend to exceed my email quota.  Regular
conversation does not cause much problem for me.

Regards,

Rafal


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]