This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Keep expected behaviour for [a-z] and [A-z] (Bug 23393).


On 07/26/2018 10:18 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Jul 26 2018, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:

The bash implementation of glob always uses strcoll/wcscoll ordering when
globasciirange is not active.  It does not use collation element ordering,
so rearranging collation data does not affect it.

Why does strcoll not agree with the collation sequence?

The collation element ordering is encoded in the _NL_COLLATE_COLLSEQMB and _NL_COLLATE_COLLSEQWC tables, and not the weights used by strcoll.

Thanks,
Florian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]