This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] Change URL of gcc's tarball


Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> 於 2018年7月19日 週四 上午4:08寫道:
>
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Zong Li wrote:
>
> > After 7.1.0, there is no .bz2 format of gcc's tarball.
>
> Please resend with a ChangeLog entry (I think this is appropriate without
> waiting for the release).
>
> This is nothing to do with RISC-V in any case; it's relevant if you follow
> the non-default usage of specifying a GCC version number with
> build-many-glibcs.py, *and* specify a release version rather than a branch
> / mainline version from version control - but if you do that, its
> relevance depends entirely on the version number used, not on any
> particular architectures being tested.
>
> --
> Joseph S. Myers
> joseph@codesourcery.com

Yes, I know we need to use the upstream gcc to test glibc port, I found that
issue because I just went to try the tarball flow in build_many_glibcs.py.
I will use the upstream gcc to test this port every version:)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]