This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 09/07/18 14:09, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
On 09/07/2018 09:15, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:built and tested on a power8 machine now, glibc math tests pass (except for an unrelated fmal failure), benchmark improvements are consistent with aarch64/x86_64, but it was a shared access machine so i won't post exact numbers, sincosf improved a bit too, sinf/cosf didn't (apparently powerpc has its own implementation).PowerPC sinf/cosf uses the same algorithm used on x86, I presume it would be a gain to generic implementation as well.
you mean the new implementation would be better or the target specific one? new implementation has better latency on this particular powerpc machine than the target specific code, but throughput is worse sometimes (using the default 0 setting for PREFER_FLOAT_COMPARISON).
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |