This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [RFC 0/4] Add a new mutex type PTHREAD_MUTEX_QUEUESPINNER_NP
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: "Wang, Kemi" <kemi dot wang at intel dot com>, Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Rical Jason <rj at 2c3t dot io>, Glibc alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: Dave Hansen <dave dot hansen at linux dot intel dot com>, "Chen, Tim C" <tim dot c dot chen at intel dot com>, "Kleen, Andi" <andi dot kleen at intel dot com>, "Huang, Ying" <ying dot huang at intel dot com>, "Lu, Aaron" <aaron dot lu at intel dot com>, "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey dot li at intel dot com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 12:17:21 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Add a new mutex type PTHREAD_MUTEX_QUEUESPINNER_NP
- References: <1530519116-13103-1-git-send-email-kemi.wang@intel.com> <11b23352-762c-3f35-8bbf-da9fbfef075c@redhat.com> <4b86721b-56f0-2968-305e-176198cf2cf8@intel.com> <57de1db9-f81d-2732-fb2f-25009201697c@redhat.com> <25017BF213203E48912DB000DE5F5E1E6B834079@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 07/06/2018 11:56 AM, Wang, Kemi wrote:
>> Given that distributions could backport this (no new symbols, just
>> a new flag), is there really any rush in getting it reviewed?
>
> To be honest, yes, please. And I will respond your feedback ASAP.
This sounds mysterious. Why are you in a rush?
--
Cheers,
Carlos.