This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] libc-abis: Define ABSOLUTE ABI [BZ #19818][BZ #23307]


Hi Carlos,

> > +* The GNU C Library now has correct support for ABSOLUTE symbols
> > +  (SHN_ABS-relative symbols).  Previously such ABSOLUTE symbols were
> > +  relocated incorrectly or in some cases discarded.  The GNU linker can
> > +  make use of this newer semantics, but it must communicate it to the
> 
> Suggest:
> "make use of the corrected semantics, ..."

 Hmm, "semantics" is uncountable rather than plural[1], so I'm not sure if 
"this semantics" is actually a grammatical mistake (just like "Can I drink 
this milk?" is fine), but I'm fine with your suggestion.  I actually 
considered using "the" to avoid having this discussion. ;)

 Committed with your suggestion applied then.  Thank you for your review.

  Maciej

References:

[1] <https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/semantics>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]