This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Retroactively Resolving Bugs
On 02/22/2018 12:39 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 02/22/2018 12:12 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>> On Thursday 22 February 2018 01:37 PM, Rical Jasan wrote:
>>> I noticed BZ #16335  was resolved by 6a3962c4a408 (Document missing
>>> feature test macros; ), but I wasn't intentionally working on that
>>> bug so it wasn't annotated accordingly. I see that
>>> scripts/list-fixed-bugs.py will catch it if I close it (FIXED with
>>> target milestone), but should I also update the ChangeLog entry to
>>> include the [BZ #] tag? (While the original commit can't be amended, I
>>> could also reference it in the commit message for the ChangeLog update.)
>> Updating the ChangeLog should be fine IMO, encouraged in fact as long as
>> we are maintaining the ChangeLog.
> Agreed. Please feel free, on master, to fix anything that is missing
> bug numbers.
I updated the ChangeLog and closed the bug.