This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: glibc 2.25 seems to have broken AddressSaniitzer Inbox x glibc x sanitizer x

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:43:39 +0100
Subject: Re: glibc 2.25 seems to have broken AddressSaniitzer Inbox x glibc x sanitizer x
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CAGQ9bdyZDj6gs6G3h2gQ2UyWVMHpuYi3SU0zyJKfGDumP3hJTA@mail.gmail.com> <bb5bec42-3dad-b064-4c74-ed54a96a7149@linaro.org>

On 02/21/2018 10:57 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:

My view off the ABI your proposed is for stack boundaries and static TLS part
it seems reasonable: both query functions initial descriptions are
straightforward and internal implementation should require only reading some
internal states.

glibc does not know the stack boundaries, though. We do not requirethat applications use the glibc-allocated stack . (We do, however,require that applications use the glibc-allocated thread control block.)


Thanks,
Florian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.25 seems to have broken AddressSaniitzer Inbox x glibc x sanitizer x
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

References:
- glibc 2.25 seems to have broken AddressSaniitzer Inbox x glibc x sanitizer x
  - From: Konstantin Serebryany
- Re: glibc 2.25 seems to have broken AddressSaniitzer Inbox x glibc x sanitizer x
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]